CVE-2025-38001

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net_sched: hfsc: Address reentrant enqueue adding class to eltree twice Savino says: "We are writing to report that this recent patch (141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547) [1] can be bypassed, and a UAF can still occur when HFSC is utilized with NETEM. The patch only checks the cl->cl_nactive field to determine whether it is the first insertion or not [2], but this field is only incremented by init_vf [3]. By using HFSC_RSC (which uses init_ed) [4], it is possible to bypass the check and insert the class twice in the eltree. Under normal conditions, this would lead to an infinite loop in hfsc_dequeue for the reasons we already explained in this report [5]. However, if TBF is added as root qdisc and it is configured with a very low rate, it can be utilized to prevent packets from being dequeued. This behavior can be exploited to perform subsequent insertions in the HFSC eltree and cause a UAF." To fix both the UAF and the infinite loop, with netem as an hfsc child, check explicitly in hfsc_enqueue whether the class is already in the eltree whenever the HFSC_RSC flag is set. [1] https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1572 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L677 [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1574 [5] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/8DuRWwfqjoRDLDmBMlIfbrsZg9Gx50DHJc1ilxsEBNe2D6NMoigR_eIRIG0LOjMc3r10nUUZtArXx4oZBIdUfZQrwjcQhdinnMis_0G7VEk=@willsroot.io/T/#u
CVSS

No CVSS.

Configurations

No configuration.

History

09 Jun 2025, 15:15

Type Values Removed Values Added
References
  • () https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac9fe7dd8e730a103ae4481147395cc73492d786 -

09 Jun 2025, 12:15

Type Values Removed Values Added
Summary
  • (es) En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net_sched: hfsc: Dirección de cola reentrante que añade clase a eltree dos veces. Savino afirma: "Les escribimos para informarles que este parche reciente (141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547) [1] se puede omitir, y aún puede producirse una UAF cuando se utiliza HFSC con NETEM. El parche solo comprueba el campo cl->cl_nactive para determinar si es la primera inserción o no [2], pero este campo solo se incrementa con init_vf [3]. Al usar HFSC_RSC (que utiliza init_ed) [4], es posible omitir la comprobación e insertar la clase dos veces en eltree. En condiciones normales, esto provocaría un bucle infinito en hfsc_dequeue por las razones que ya explicamos en este informe [5]. Sin embargo, si TBF se añade como qdisc raíz y es Configurado con una tasa muy baja, puede utilizarse para evitar que los paquetes se desencolan. Este comportamiento puede aprovecharse para realizar inserciones posteriores en el eltree de HFSC y provocar un UAF. Para solucionar tanto el UAF como el bucle infinito, con netem como elemento secundario de hfsc, compruebe explícitamente en hfsc_enqueue si la clase ya está en el eltree cuando se activa el indicador HFSC_RSC. [1] https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=141d34391abbb315d68556b7c67ad97885407547 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1572 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L677 [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15-rc5/source/net/sched/sch_hfsc.c#L1574 [5] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/8DuRWwfqjoRDLDmBMlIfbrsZg9Gx50DHJc1ilxsEBNe2D6NMoigR_eIRIG0LOjMc3r10nUUZtArXx4oZBIdUfZQrwjcQhdinnMis_0G7VEk=@willsroot.io/T/#u

06 Jun 2025, 14:15

Type Values Removed Values Added
New CVE

Information

Published : 2025-06-06 14:15

Updated : 2025-06-09 15:15


NVD link : CVE-2025-38001

Mitre link : CVE-2025-38001

CVE.ORG link : CVE-2025-38001


JSON object : View

Products Affected

No product.

CWE

No CWE.