Total
12189 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-7409 | 1 Unixodbc | 1 Unixodbc | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In unixODBC before 2.3.5, there is a buffer overflow in the unicode_to_ansi_copy() function in DriverManager/__info.c. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7339 | 1 Mp4v2 Project | 1 Mp4v2 | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The MP4Atom class in mp4atom.cpp in MP4v2 through 2.0.0 mishandles Entry Number validation for the MP4 Table Property, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (overflow, insufficient memory allocation, and segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted mp4 file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7284 | 2 Debian, Digium | 3 Debian Linux, Asterisk, Certified Asterisk | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Asterisk through 13.19.1, 14.x through 14.7.5, and 15.x through 15.2.1, and Certified Asterisk through 13.18-cert2. When processing a SUBSCRIBE request, the res_pjsip_pubsub module stores the accepted formats present in the Accept headers of the request. This code did not limit the number of headers it processed, despite having a fixed limit of 32. If more than 32 Accept headers were present, the code would write outside of its memory and cause a crash. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7247 | 1 Leptonica | 1 Leptonica | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in pixHtmlViewer in prog/htmlviewer.c in Leptonica before 1.75.3. Unsanitized input (rootname) can overflow a buffer, leading potentially to arbitrary code execution or possibly unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7167 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Calling Buffer.fill() or Buffer.alloc() with some parameters can lead to a hang which could result in a Denial of Service. In order to address this vulnerability, the implementations of Buffer.alloc() and Buffer.fill() were updated so that they zero fill instead of hanging in these cases. All versions of Node.js 6.x (LTS "Boron"), 8.x (LTS "Carbon"), and 9.x are vulnerable. All versions of Node.js 10.x (Current) are NOT vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7116 | 1 Hp | 1 Intelligent Management Center | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) prior to IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) is vulnerable to a remote denial of service via dbman Opcode 10003 'Filename'. This problem is resolved in IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) or subsequent versions. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7115 | 2 Hp, Microsoft | 2 Intelligent Management Center, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) prior to IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) is vulnerable to a remote buffer overflow in dbman.exe opcode 10001 on Windows. This problem is resolved in IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) or subsequent versions. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7114 | 1 Hp | 1 Intelligent Management Center | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) prior to IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) is vulnerable to remote buffer overflow in dbman leading to code execution. This problem is resolved in IMC PLAT 7.3 (E0605P06) or subsequent versions. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7039 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| CCN-lite 2.0.0 Beta allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact because the ccnl_ndntlv_prependBlob function in ccnl-pkt-ndntlv.c can be called with wrong arguments. Specifically, there is an incorrect integer data type causing a negative third argument in some cases of crafted TLV data with inconsistent length information. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6953 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In CCN-lite 2, the Parser of NDNTLV does not verify whether a certain component's length field matches the actual component length, which has a resultant buffer overflow and out-of-bounds memory accesses. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6948 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In CCN-lite 2, the function ccnl_prefix_to_str_detailed can cause a buffer overflow, when writing a prefix to the buffer buf. The maximal size of the prefix is CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE; the buffer has the size CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE. However, when NFN is enabled, additional characters are written to the buffer (e.g., the "NFN" and "R2C" tags). Therefore, sending an NFN-R2C packet with a prefix of size CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE can cause an overflow of buf inside ccnl_prefix_to_str_detailed. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6892 | 1 Cloudme | 1 Sync | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in CloudMe before 1.11.0. An unauthenticated remote attacker that can connect to the "CloudMe Sync" client application listening on port 8888 can send a malicious payload causing a buffer overflow condition. This will result in an attacker controlling the program's execution flow and allowing arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6876 | 2 Imagemagick, Libfpx Project | 2 Imagemagick, Libfpx | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The OLEProperty class in ole/oleprop.cpp in libfpx 1.3.1-10, as used in ImageMagick 7.0.7-22 Q16 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack-based buffer under-read) via a crafted bmp image. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6857 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x802022E0. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0x12 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6856 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x8020601C. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6855 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202014. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0xFFFFFFF will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6854 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via multiple IOCTLs, e.g., 0x8810200B, 0x8810200F, 0x8810201B, 0x8810201F, 0x8810202B, 0x8810202F, 0x8810203F, 0x8810204B, 0x88102003, 0x88102007, 0x88102013, 0x88102017, 0x88102027, 0x88102033, 0x88102037, 0x88102043, and 0x88102047. When some conditions in the user-controlled input buffer are not met, the driver writes an error code (0x2000001A) to a user-controlled address. Also, note that all the aforementioned IOCTLs use transfer type METHOD_NEITHER, which means that the I/O manager does not validate any of the supplied pointers and buffer sizes. So, even though the driver checks for input/output buffer sizes, it doesn't validate if the pointers to those buffers are actually valid. So, we can supply a pointer for the output buffer to a kernel address space address, and the error code will be written there. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6853 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206024. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6852 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202298. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the nt!memset function is called to zero out contents of a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6851 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206040. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant DWORD 0 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||