Total
10511 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-47283 | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
Gardener implements the automated management and operation of Kubernetes clusters as a service. A security vulnerability was discovered in Gardener prior to versions 1.116.4, 1.117.5, 1.118.2, and 1.119.0 that could allow a user with administrative privileges for a Gardener project to obtain control over the seed cluster(s) where their shoot clusters are managed. This CVE affects all Gardener installations no matter of the public cloud provider(s) used for the seed clusters/shoot clusters. `gardener/gardener` (`gardenlet`) is the affected component. Versions 1.116.4, 1.117.5, 1.118.2, and 1.119.0 fix the issue. | |||||
CVE-2025-47282 | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
Gardener External DNS Management is an environment to manage external DNS entries for a kubernetes cluster. A security vulnerability was discovered in Gardener's External DNS Management prior to version 0.23.6 that could allow a user with administrative privileges for a Gardener project or a user with administrative privileges for a shoot cluster, including administrative privileges for a single namespace of the shoot cluster, to obtain control over the seed cluster where the shoot cluster is managed. This CVE affects all Gardener installations no matter of the public cloud provider(s) used for the seed clusters/shoot clusters. The affected component is `gardener/external-dns-management`. The `external-dns-management` component may also be deployed on the seeds by the `gardener/gardener-extension-shoot-dns-service` extension when the extension is enabled. In this case, all versions of the `shoot-dns-service` extension `<= v1.60.0` are affected by this vulnerability. Version 0.23.6 of Gardener External DNS Management fixes the issue. | |||||
CVE-2024-31841 | 1 Italtel | 1 Embrace | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Italtel Embrace 1.6.4. The web server fails to sanitize input data, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on the filesystem. | |||||
CVE-2022-36448 | 1 Insyde | 1 Insydeh2o | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O with kernel 5.0 through 5.5. There is an SMM memory corruption vulnerability in the Software SMI handler in the PnpSmm driver. | |||||
CVE-2022-40277 | 3 Canonical, Joplinapp, Linux | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Joplin, Linux Kernel | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
Joplin version 2.8.8 allows an external attacker to execute arbitrary commands remotely on any client that opens a link in a malicious markdown file, via Joplin. This is possible because the application does not properly validate the schema/protocol of existing links in the markdown file before passing them to the 'shell.openExternal' function. | |||||
CVE-2019-0973 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude unintended elevation. | |||||
CVE-2019-0722 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-05-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | |||||
CVE-2019-0713 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-05-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | |||||
CVE-2019-0711 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-05-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | |||||
CVE-2019-0710 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-05-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | |||||
CVE-2019-0709 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-05-20 | 7.7 HIGH | 7.6 HIGH |
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | |||||
CVE-2019-0620 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.7 HIGH | 7.6 HIGH |
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | |||||
CVE-2022-41606 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Nomad | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.0.2 up to 1.2.12, and 1.3.5 jobs submitted with an artifact stanza using invalid S3 or GCS URLs can be used to crash client agents. Fixed in 1.2.13, 1.3.6, and 1.4.0. | |||||
CVE-2022-40923 | 1 Lief-project | 1 Lief | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
A vulnerability in the LIEF::MachO::SegmentCommand::virtual_address function of LIEF v0.12.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DOS) through a segmentation fault via a crafted MachO file. | |||||
CVE-2024-12014 | 2025-05-20 | N/A | N/A | ||
Path Traversal vulnerability in the eSignaViewer component in eSigna product versions 1.0 to 1.5 on all platforms allow an unauthenticated attacker to access arbitrary files in the document system via manipulation of file paths and object identifiers. | |||||
CVE-2025-43560 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-05-19 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security mechanisms and execute code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. | |||||
CVE-2025-29955 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 11 24h2, Windows Server 2022 23h2, Windows Server 2025 | 2025-05-19 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
Improper input validation in Windows Hyper-V allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service locally. | |||||
CVE-2025-29968 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2025-05-19 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
Improper input validation in Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network. | |||||
CVE-2025-22233 | 2025-05-19 | N/A | 3.1 LOW | ||
CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation. | |||||
CVE-2024-24549 | 3 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2025-05-19 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Denial of Service due to improper input validation vulnerability for HTTP/2 requests in Apache Tomcat. When processing an HTTP/2 request, if the request exceeded any of the configured limits for headers, the associated HTTP/2 stream was not reset until after all of the headers had been processed.This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M16, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.18, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.85, from 8.5.0 through 8.5.98. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M17, 10.1.19, 9.0.86 or 8.5.99 which fix the issue. |