Total
7914 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-6054 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The YANewsflash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yanewsflash/yanewsflash.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7690 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Affiliate Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'affiplus_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform an unauthorized action granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7835 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The iThoughts Advanced Code Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ithoughts_ace_update_options' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1257 | 5 Apple, Cisco, Linux and 2 more | 5 Macos, Catalyst Center, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-07-23 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to manipulate an authenticated user into executing malicious actions without their awareness or consent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a web-based management user to follow a specially crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the authenticated user. These actions include modifying the device configuration, disconnecting the user's session, and executing Command Runner commands. | |||||
| CVE-2025-41661 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices due to lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11014 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NEC Corporation UNIVERGE IX from Ver9.2 to Ver10.10.21, for Ver10.8 up to Ver10.8.27 and for Ver10.9 up to Ver10.9.14 allows a attacker to hijack the authentication of screens on the device via the management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2023-48790 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortindr | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A cross site request forgery vulnerability [CWE-352] in Fortinet FortiNDR version 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.1.0 through 7.1.1 and before 7.0.5 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized actions via crafted HTTP GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4128 | 1 Google | 1 Firebase Command Line Interface | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| This vulnerability was a potential CSRF attack. When running the Firebase emulator suite, there is an export endpoint that is used normally to export data from running emulators. If a user was running the emulator and navigated to a malicious website with the exploit on a browser that allowed calls to localhost (ie Chrome before v94), the website could exfiltrate emulator data. We recommend upgrading past version 13.6.0 or commit 068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0 https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools/commit/068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0 | |||||
| CVE-2025-6781 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Copymatic – AI Content Writer & Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'copymatic-menu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the copymatic_apikey option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6053 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Zuppler Online Ordering plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'zuppler-online-ordering-options' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50586 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| StudentManage v1.0 was discovered to contain Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2025-7369 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the preview function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In combination with CVE-2025-7354, it leads to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7669 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Avishi WP PayPal Payment Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'avishi-wp-paypal-payment-button/index.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7687 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Latest Post Accordian Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'lpaccordian' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7685 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Like & Share My Site plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'lsms_admin' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20321 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7 and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.114, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker can send a specially-crafted SPL search that could change the membership state in a Splunk Search Head Cluster (SHC) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to the removal of the captain or a member of the SHC.<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20322 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7, and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.113, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially-crafted SPL search command that could trigger a rolling restart in the Search Head Cluster through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS).<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.<br><br>See [How rolling restart works](https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.4.2/DistSearch/RestartSHC) for more information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20228 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.3, 9.2.5, and 9.1.8 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.2.2403.108, and 9.1.2312.204, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could change the maintenance mode state of App Key Value Store (KVStore) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2024-7760 | 1 Aimstack | 1 Aim | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| aimhubio/aim version 3.22.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the tracking server. The vulnerability is due to overly permissive CORS settings, allowing cross-origin requests from all origins. This enables CSRF attacks on all endpoints of the tracking server, which can be chained with other existing vulnerabilities such as remote code execution, denial of service, and arbitrary file read/write. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26211 | 1 Gibbonedu | 1 Gibbon | 2025-07-18 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| Gibbon before 29.0.00 allows CSRF. | |||||