Total
60 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-6772 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-12-26 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.182 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2024-2174 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2024-12-19 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 122.0.6261.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2024-3845 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2024-12-19 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Networks in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to bypass mixed content policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2024-3844 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2024-12-19 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2024-40650 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In wifi_item_edit_content of styles.xml , there is a possible FRP bypass due to Missing check for FRP state. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27842 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2024-12-09 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.5. An app may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-12056 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Client secret is not checked when using the OAuth Password grant type. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker could connect to a web server using a client application not explicitly authorized as part of the OAuth deployment. Exploitation requires valid credentials and does not permit the attacker to bypass user privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6101 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.114 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2024-5500 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Sign-In in Google Chrome prior to 1.3.36.351 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2024-3838 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious app to perform UI spoofing via a crafted app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2024-2617 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability exists in the RTU500 that allows for authenticated and authorized users to bypass secure update. If a malicious actor successfully exploits this vulnerability, they could use it to update the RTU500 with unsigned firmware. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23592 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability was reported in Lenovo devices with Synaptics fingerprint readers that could allow an attacker with physical access to replay fingerprints and bypass Windows Hello authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40445 | 1 Apple | 2 Ipados, Iphone Os | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The issue was addressed with improved UI handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1 and iPadOS 17.1. A device may persistently fail to lock. | |||||
| CVE-2023-39403 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Parameter verification vulnerability in the installd module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause sandbox files to be read and written without authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2585 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Container Platform For Ibm Z and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| Keycloak's device authorization grant does not correctly validate the device code and client ID. An attacker client could abuse the missing validation to spoof a client consent request and trick an authorization admin into granting consent to a malicious OAuth client or possible unauthorized access to an existing OAuth client. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28601 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| Zoom for Windows clients prior to 5.14.0 contain an improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer vulnerability. A malicious user may alter protected Zoom Client memory buffer potentially causing integrity issues within the Zoom Client. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22156 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21387 | 1 Wrongthink | 1 Wrongthink | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Wrongthink peer-to-peer, end-to-end encrypted messenger with PeerJS and Axolotl ratchet. In wrongthink from version 2.0.0 and before 2.3.0 there was a set of vulnerabilities causing inadequate encryption strength. Part of the secret identity key was disclosed by the fingerprint used for connection. Additionally, the safety number was improperly calculated. It was computed using part of one of the public identity keys instead of being derived from both public identity keys. This caused issues in computing safety numbers which would potentially be exploitable in the real world. Additionally there was inadequate encryption strength due to use of 1024-bit DSA keys. These issues are all fixed in version 2.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25686 | 4 Arista, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Eos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150 pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name. This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the "Birthday Attacks" section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10743 | 2 Elastic, Redhat | 2 Kibana, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that OpenShift Container Platform's (OCP) distribution of Kibana could open in an iframe, which made it possible to intercept and manipulate requests. This flaw allows an attacker to trick a user into performing arbitrary actions in OCP's distribution of Kibana, such as clickjacking. | |||||