Total
1667 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-37033 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
In dotCMS 5.x-22.06, TempFileAPI allows a user to create a temporary file based on a passed in URL, while attempting to block any SSRF access to local IP addresses or private subnets. In resolving this URL, the TempFileAPI follows any 302 redirects that the remote URL returns. Because there is no re-validation of the redirect URL, the TempFileAPI can be used to return data from those local/private hosts that should not be accessible remotely. | |||||
CVE-2024-10207 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an authenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. | |||||
CVE-2024-10206 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an unauthenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. | |||||
CVE-2025-27406 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH | ||
Icinga Reporting is the central component for reporting related functionality in the monitoring web frontend and framework Icinga Web 2. A vulnerability present in versions 0.10.0 through 1.0.2 allows to set up a template that allows to embed arbitrary Javascript. This enables the attacker to act on behalf of the user, if the template is being previewed; and act on behalf of the headless browser, if a report using the template is printed to PDF. This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.3 of Icinga Reporting. As a workaround, review all templates and remove suspicious settings. | |||||
CVE-2024-13411 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
The Zapier for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1 via the updated_user() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
CVE-2025-30914 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in XpeedStudio Metform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Metform: from n/a through 3.9.2. | |||||
CVE-2025-22672 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SuitePlugins Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member: from n/a through 1.1.2. | |||||
CVE-2024-13923 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Order Export \& Order Import For Woocommerce | 2025-03-26 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
The Order Export & Order Import for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.0 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
CVE-2024-40544 | 1 Publiccms | 1 Publiccms | 2025-03-26 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/#maintenance_sysTask/edit. | |||||
CVE-2025-2691 | 1 Nossrf Project | 1 Nossrf | 2025-03-26 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. | |||||
CVE-2024-22217 | 1 Terminalfour | 1 Terminalfour | 2025-03-24 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Terminalfour before 8.3.19 allows authenticated users to use specific features to access internal services including sensitive information on the server that Terminalfour runs on. | |||||
CVE-2024-45317 | 2025-03-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. | |||||
CVE-2024-13856 | 2025-03-22 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
The Your Friendly Drag and Drop Page Builder — Make Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.10 via the make_builder_ajax_subscribe() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
CVE-2024-10524 | 2025-03-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
Applications that use Wget to access a remote resource using shorthand URLs and pass arbitrary user credentials in the URL are vulnerable. In these cases attackers can enter crafted credentials which will cause Wget to access an arbitrary host. | |||||
CVE-2024-27564 | 1 Dirk1983 | 1 Chatgpt | 2025-03-20 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
pictureproxy.php in the dirk1983 mm1.ltd source code f9f4bbc allows SSRF via the url parameter. NOTE: the references section has an archived copy of pictureproxy.php from its original GitHub location, but the repository name might later change because it is misleading. | |||||
CVE-2024-8099 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH | ||
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. | |||||
CVE-2024-12068 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in haotian-liu/llava, affecting version git c121f04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make the server perform HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing sensitive data that is only accessible from the server, such as AWS metadata credentials. | |||||
CVE-2024-10457 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
Multiple Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities were identified in the significant-gravitas/autogpt repository, specifically in the GitHub Integration and Web Search blocks. These vulnerabilities affect version agpt-platform-beta-v0.1.1. The issues arise when block inputs are controlled by untrusted sources, leading to potential credential leakage, internal network scanning, and unauthorized access to internal services, APIs, or data stores. The affected blocks include GithubListPullRequestsBlock, GithubReadPullRequestBlock, GithubAssignPRReviewerBlock, GithubListPRReviewersBlock, GithubUnassignPRReviewerBlock, GithubCommentBlock, GithubMakeIssueBlock, GithubReadIssueBlock, GithubListIssuesBlock, GithubAddLabelBlock, GithubRemoveLabelBlock, GithubListBranchesBlock, and ExtractWebsiteContentBlock. | |||||
CVE-2024-32812 | 1 Podlove | 1 Podlove Podcast Publisher | 2025-03-19 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher.This issue affects Podlove Podcast Publisher: from n/a through 4.0.11. | |||||
CVE-2021-33926 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone | 2025-03-19 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
An issue in Plone CMS v. 5.2.4, 5.2.3, 5.2.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.0, 5.1rc2, 5.1rc1, 5.1b4, 5.1b3, 5.1b2, 5.1a2, 5.1a1, 5.1.7, 5.1.6, 5.1.5, 5.1.4, 5.1.2, 5.1.1 5.1, 5.0rc3, 5.0rc2, 5.0rc1, 5.0.9, 5.0.8, 5.0.7, 5.0.6, 5.0.5, 5.0.4, 5.0.3, 5.0.2, 5.0.10, 5.0.1, 5.0, 4.3.9, 4.3.8, 4.3.7, 4.3.6, 4.3.5, 4.3.4, 4.3.3, 4.3.20, 4 allows attacker to access sensitive information via the RSS feed protlet. |