Total
307142 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-38553 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Restrict conditions for adding duplicating netems to qdisc tree netem_enqueue's duplication prevention logic breaks when a netem resides in a qdisc tree with other netems - this can lead to a soft lockup and OOM loop in netem_dequeue, as seen in [1]. Ensure that a duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other netems. Previous approaches suggested in discussions in chronological order: 1) Track duplication status or ttl in the sk_buff struct. Considered too specific a use case to extend such a struct, though this would be a resilient fix and address other previous and potential future DOS bugs like the one described in loopy fun [2]. 2) Restrict netem_enqueue recursion depth like in act_mirred with a per cpu variable. However, netem_dequeue can call enqueue on its child, and the depth restriction could be bypassed if the child is a netem. 3) Use the same approach as in 2, but add metadata in netem_skb_cb to handle the netem_dequeue case and track a packet's involvement in duplication. This is an overly complex approach, and Jamal notes that the skb cb can be overwritten to circumvent this safeguard. 4) Prevent the addition of a netem to a qdisc tree if its ancestral path contains a netem. However, filters and actions can cause a packet to change paths when re-enqueued to the root from netem duplication, leading us to the current solution: prevent a duplicating netem from inhabiting the same tree as other netems. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/8DuRWwfqjoRDLDmBMlIfbrsZg9Gx50DHJc1ilxsEBNe2D6NMoigR_eIRIG0LOjMc3r10nUUZtArXx4oZBIdUfZQrwjcQhdinnMis_0G7VEk=@willsroot.io/ [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/719297/ | |||||
| CVE-2025-43740 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.3.120 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.8, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.15, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13 and 2024.Q1.9 through 2024.Q1.19 allows an remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript through the message boards feature available via the web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8783 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Contact Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'title’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 8.6.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8357 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Media Library Assistant plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion in the /wp-content/uploads directory due to insufficient file path validation and user capability checking in the _process_mla_download_file function in all versions up to, and including, 3.27. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server from the /wp-content/uploads/ directory. | |||||
| CVE-2024-55896 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM PowerHA SystemMirror for i 7.4 and 7.5 contains improper restrictions when rendering content via iFrames. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain improper access and perform unauthorized actions on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21457 | 1 Qualcomm | 30 Ar8035, Ar8035 Firmware, Fastconnect 7800 and 27 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Information disclosure while opening a fastrpc session when domain is not sanitized. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21458 | 1 Qualcomm | 48 Fastconnect 6900, Fastconnect 6900 Firmware, Qam8255p and 45 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory corruption when IOCTL interface is called to map and unmap buffers simultaneously. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21461 | 1 Qualcomm | 48 Fastconnect 6900, Fastconnect 6900 Firmware, Fastconnect 7800 and 45 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory corruption when programming registers through virtual CDM. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21473 | 1 Qualcomm | 12 Fastconnect 6900, Fastconnect 6900 Firmware, Fastconnect 7800 and 9 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory corruption when using Virtual cdm (Camera Data Mover) to write registers. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21474 | 1 Qualcomm | 90 Fastconnect 6800, Fastconnect 6800 Firmware, Fastconnect 6900 and 87 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory corruption while processing commands from A2dp sink command queue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21611 | 1 Tgstation13 | 1 Tgstation-server | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| tgstation-server is a production scale tool for BYOND server management. Prior to 6.12.3, roles used to authorize API methods were incorrectly OR'd instead of AND'ed with the role used to determine if a user was enabled. This allows enabled users access to most, but not all, authorized actions regardless of their permissions. Notably, the WriteUsers right is unaffected so users may not use this bug to permanently elevate their account permissions. The fix is release in tgstation-server-v6.12.3. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8312 | 1 Devolutions | 1 Devolutions Server | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Deadlock in PAM automatic check-in feature in Devolutions Server allows a password to remain valid beyond the end of its intended check-out period due to a deadlock occurring in the scheduling service.This issue affects the following version(s) : * Devolutions Server 2025.2.2.0 through 2025.2.5.0 * Devolutions Server 2025.1.12.0 and earlier | |||||
| CVE-2025-1433 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1431 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1430 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1429 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1428 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1427 | 1 Autodesk | 9 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 6 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Uninitialized Variable vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1277 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Revit | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk applications, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1276 | 1 Autodesk | 17 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 14 more | 2025-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A maliciously crafted DWG file, when parsed through certain Autodesk applications, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | |||||