Total
295251 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-4044 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: The MS-RPC functionality in smbd in Samba 3 on SUSE Linux before 20070720 does not include "one character in the shell escape handling." NOTE: this issue was originally characterized as a shell metacharacter issue due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-2447, which was interpreted by CVE to be security relevant. However, SUSE and Red Hat have disputed the problem, stating that the only impact is that scripts will not be executed if they have a "c" in their name, but even this limitation might not exist. This does not have security implications, so should not be included in CVE | |||||
| CVE-2006-4896 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4785. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4785. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4785 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-6491 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2007-6449 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6121. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6121. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6121 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-5470 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5740. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5740 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5740 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-5756 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2007-5908 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources. | |||||
| CVE-2006-7224 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, CVE-2006-7228. Reason: this candidate was SPLIT into other identifiers in order to reflect different affected versions and distinct vendor fixes. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, and CVE-2006-7228 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-5288 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5283. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-1323 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2893. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but some sources used this identifier for a separate issue, and a duplicate identifier had also been created by the time dual use was detected. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2007-2893 to determine if it is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-3090 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0591. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0591. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0591 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-6100 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-0886 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-2938 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2937. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. it was incorrectly used to identify CVE-2006-2937. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2006-6492 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2006-5941 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2177. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2177. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2177 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-5125 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-1271 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1218. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1218. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1218 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6446 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6118. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6118. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6118 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-1752 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1499. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1499. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1499 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||