Total
296139 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-4826 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3853. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0795 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-1378 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362. Reason: This candidate has been withdrawn by its CNA. It was SPLIT into separate candidates before publication. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, and CVE-2008-2362 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3610 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3695. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3695. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3695 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-4430 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-3427 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3420. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3420. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3420 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-1781 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-3870 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-0004 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-2845 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2768. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2768. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2768 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6339 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6067 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5838. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5838. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5838 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-3120 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3363. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3363. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3363 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3908 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-4312 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2009-2086 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-2315 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-0671 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions | |||||
| CVE-2008-2727 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2725. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2725. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2725 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-3517 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||