Total
297954 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-1894 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-2561. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-2561. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-2561 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2012-2342 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-5097. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-5097. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-5097 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-4146 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2011-4383 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2013-6379 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4513. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4513. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4513 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-4394 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2012-1091 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-1410. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-1410. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-1410 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-4481 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3111. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3111. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3111 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-4323 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-1161 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1160, CVE-2011-1162. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that only two candidates, CVE-2011-1160 and CVE-2011-1162, were needed for the set of security issues in question. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2011-3633 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3297 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-2708 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2710. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2710. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2710 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2010-1738 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1448. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1448. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1448 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-1501 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1571. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1571. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2010-3932 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2011-1415 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1290. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1290. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1290 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2011-0634 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1002. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1002. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1002 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2010-1680 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2010-4510 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4150. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4150. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4150 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||