Total
298727 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-1205 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-2033 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1381. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1381. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1381 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3906 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3606. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-5020 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-2645 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-5850 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria | |||||
| CVE-2009-0589 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2008-2737 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-2546 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1805. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1805. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1805 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3907 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3607. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6049 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in TinyMCE 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the menuID parameter. NOTE: CVE and multiple reliable third parties dispute this issue, since TinyMCE does not contain index.php or any PHP code. This may be an issue in a product that has integrated TinyMCE | |||||
| CVE-2008-4112 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3195. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-2259 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2608. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-5622 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5621. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-1683 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0887. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0887. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0887 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-4054 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3672. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3672. The duplicate was assigned by the CNA without proper coordination with MITRE. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3672 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-1563 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2009-3239 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2139, CVE-2009-2140. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6176 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-6800 | 2023-12-14 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor's misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The upstream vendor states: "The Samba Team sees no way to exploit this race condition by a user of the system or an external attacker. In order to be able to trigger the race condition a privileged user (root) need to intentionally kill a winbind child process and carefully time the killing to trigger the race condition. Although, if the user is already privileged, it can more easily just kill the parent process directly." CVE concurs with the dispute. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier | |||||