Filtered by vendor Oracle
Subscribe
Filtered by product Communications Unified Inventory Management
Subscribe
Total
72 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-39144 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39146 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39148 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39150 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39152 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39154 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 12 more | 2025-05-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10173 | 2 Oracle, Xstream | 10 Banking Platform, Business Activity Monitoring, Communications Billing And Revenue Management Elastic Charging Engine and 7 more | 2025-05-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285) | |||||
| CVE-2022-22965 | 5 Cisco, Oracle, Siemens and 2 more | 39 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 36 more | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23632 | 2 Oracle, Traefik | 2 Communications Unified Inventory Management, Traefik | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23307 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Qos | 26 Chainsaw, Log4j, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23305 | 5 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 2 more | 28 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 25 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23302 | 5 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 2 more | 26 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4104 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 46 Log4j, Fedora, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 43 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-45105 | 5 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 2 more | 121 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 118 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36374 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 36 Ant, Agile Engineering Data Management, Agile Plm and 33 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36373 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 32 Ant, Agile Plm, Banking Trade Finance and 29 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36090 | 3 Apache, Netapp, Oracle | 34 Commons Compress, Active Iq Unified Manager, Oncommand Insight and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, Compress can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error even for very small inputs. This could be used to mount a denial of service attack against services that use Compress' zip package. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22118 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Vmware | 32 Hci, Management Services For Element Software, Commerce Guided Search and 29 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22112 | 3 Oracle, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 8 Communications Element Manager, Communications Interactive Session Recorder, Communications Unified Inventory Management and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9488 | 4 Apache, Debian, Oracle and 1 more | 46 Log4j, Debian Linux, Communications Application Session Controller and 43 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1 | |||||