Total
246 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-50311 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Container Platform | 2025-02-25 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was found in OpenShift. This flaw allows attackers to exploit the GraphQL batching functionality. The vulnerability arises when multiple queries can be sent within a single request, enabling an attacker to submit a request containing thousands of aliases in one query. This issue causes excessive resource consumption, leading to application unavailability for legitimate users. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1003029 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Script Security, Openshift Container Platform | 2025-02-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/SecureGroovyScript.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1003030 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift Container Platform | 2025-02-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShell.java that allows attackers able to control pipeline scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50312 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Container Platform | 2025-01-15 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in GraphQL due to improper access controls on the GraphQL introspection query. This flaw allows unauthorized users to retrieve a comprehensive list of available queries and mutations. Exposure to this flaw increases the attack surface, as it can facilitate the discovery of flaws or errors specific to the application's GraphQL implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 30 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 27 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2253 | 1 Redhat | 3 Openshift Api For Data Protection, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Developer Tools And Services | 2025-01-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the `/v2/_catalog` endpoint in distribution/distribution, which accepts a parameter to control the maximum number of records returned (query string: `n`). This vulnerability allows a malicious user to submit an unreasonably large value for `n,` causing the allocation of a massive string array, possibly causing a denial of service through excessive use of memory. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3056 | 3 Fedoraproject, Podman Project, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Podman, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-12-27 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Podman. This issue may allow an attacker to create a specially crafted container that, when configured to share the same IPC with at least one other container, can create a large number of IPC resources in /dev/shm. The malicious container will continue to exhaust resources until it is out-of-memory (OOM) killed. While the malicious container's cgroup will be removed, the IPC resources it created are not. Those resources are tied to the IPC namespace that will not be removed until all containers using it are stopped, and one non-malicious container is holding the namespace open. The malicious container is restarted, either automatically or by attacker control, repeating the process and increasing the amount of memory consumed. With a container configured to restart always, such as `podman run --restart=always`, this can result in a memory-based denial of service of the system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9341 | 2 Containers, Redhat | 3 Common, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Go. When FIPS mode is enabled on a system, container runtimes may incorrectly handle certain file paths due to improper validation in the containers/common Go library. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit symbolic links and trick the system into mounting sensitive host directories inside a container. This issue also allows attackers to access critical host files, bypassing the intended isolation between containers and the host system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5154 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Cri-o, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in cri-o. A malicious container can create a symbolic link to arbitrary files on the host via directory traversal (“../“). This flaw allows the container to read and write to arbitrary files on the host system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27561 | 3 Debian, Linuxfoundation, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Runc, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| runc through 1.1.4 has Incorrect Access Control leading to Escalation of Privileges, related to libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go. To exploit this, an attacker must be able to spawn two containers with custom volume-mount configurations, and be able to run custom images. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2019-19921 regression. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8883 | 1 Redhat | 6 Build Of Keycloak, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Container Platform For Ibm Z and 3 more | 2024-11-26 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A misconfiguration flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue can allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary URL if a 'Valid Redirect URI' is set to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1, enabling sensitive information such as authorization codes to be exposed to the attacker, potentially leading to session hijacking. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7079 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the Openshift console. The /API/helm/verify endpoint is tasked to fetch and verify the installation of a Helm chart from a URI that is remote HTTP/HTTPS or local. Access to this endpoint is gated by the authHandlerWithUser() middleware function. Contrary to its name, this middleware function does not verify the validity of the user's credentials. As a result, unauthenticated users can access this endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5037 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Distributed Tracing | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift's Telemeter. If certain conditions are in place, an attacker can use a forged token to bypass the issue ("iss") check during JSON web token (JWT) authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4629 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Of Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Keycloak and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. This flaw allows attackers to bypass brute force protection by exploiting the timing of login attempts. By initiating multiple login requests simultaneously, attackers can exceed the configured limits for failed attempts before the system locks them out. This timing loophole enables attackers to make more guesses at passwords than intended, potentially compromising account security on affected systems. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6563 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Keycloak, Openshift Container Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| An unconstrained memory consumption vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak. It can be triggered in environments which have millions of offline tokens (> 500,000 users with each having at least 2 saved sessions). If an attacker creates two or more user sessions and then open the "consents" tab of the admin User Interface, the UI attempts to load a huge number of offline client sessions leading to excessive memory and CPU consumption which could potentially crash the entire system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6476 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in CRI-O that involves an experimental annotation leading to a container being unconfined. This may allow a pod to specify and get any amount of memory/cpu, circumventing the kubernetes scheduler and potentially resulting in a denial of service in the node. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6291 | 1 Redhat | 8 Enterprise Linux, Keycloak, Migration Toolkit For Applications and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6134 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Keycloak, Openshift Container Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak that prevents certain schemes in redirects, but permits them if a wildcard is appended to the token. This issue could allow an attacker to submit a specially crafted request leading to cross-site scripting (XSS) or further attacks. This flaw is the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-10748. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5408 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation flaw was found in the node restriction admission plugin of the kubernetes api server of OpenShift. A remote attacker who modifies the node role label could steer workloads from the control plane and etcd nodes onto different worker nodes and gain broader access to the cluster. | |||||