Filtered by vendor Kayako
Subscribe
Total
26 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-1412 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 2.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the searchm parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2005-2460 | 1 Kayako | 1 Liveresponse | 2025-04-03 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Kayako liveResponse 2.x allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) username parameter or (2) name field when entering a session or sending a message. | |||||
| CVE-2005-2463 | 1 Kayako | 1 Liveresponse | 2025-04-03 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Kayako liveResponse 2.x allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to addressbook.php and other include scripts, which reveals the path in an error message. | |||||
| CVE-2004-1413 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Kayako eSupport 2.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) subcat, (2) rate, (3) questiondetails, (4) ticketkey22, (5) email22 parameters to index.php, or (6) the e-mail field of the Forgot Key feature. | |||||
| CVE-2005-0487 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php for Kayako ESupport 2.3.1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via the nav parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35913 | 1 Kayako | 1 Samourai | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.) | |||||