Filtered by vendor Checkpoint
Subscribe
Total
130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-2689 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Web Intelligence | 2025-04-09 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Web Intelligence does not properly handle certain full-width and half-width Unicode character encodings, which might allow remote attackers to evade detection of HTTP traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1397 | 1 Checkpoint | 5 Check Point Vpn-1 Pro, Vpn-1, Vpn-1 Firewall-1 and 2 more | 2025-04-09 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1 Power/UTM, with NGX R60 through R65 and NG AI R55 software, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (site-to-site VPN tunnel outage), and possibly intercept network traffic, by configuring the local RFC1918 IP address to be the same as one of this tunnel's endpoint RFC1918 IP addresses, and then using SecuRemote to connect to a network interface at the other endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2730 | 3 Checkpoint, Comodo, Microsoft | 6 Zonealarm, Comodo Firewall Pro, Comodo Personal Firewall and 3 more | 2025-04-09 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point ZoneAlarm Pro before 6.5.737.000 does not properly test for equivalence of process identifiers for certain Microsoft Windows API functions in the NT kernel 5.0 and greater, which allows local users to call these functions, and bypass firewall rules or gain privileges, via a modified identifier that is one, two, or three greater than the canonical identifier. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5994 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Connectra Ngx | 2025-04-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Check Point Connectra NGX R62 HFA_01 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the dir parameter. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1204 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 does not properly handle certain restricted keywords (e.g., Mail, auth, time) in user-defined objects, which could produce a rule with a default "ANY" address and result in access to more systems than intended by the administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2000-1037 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 session agent 3.0 through 4.1 generates different error messages for invalid user names versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames and guess a password via a brute force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1499 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1 4.1SP4 using SecuRemote returns different error messages for valid and invalid users, with prompts that vary depending on the authentication method being used, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0675 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 can be subjected to a denial of service via UDP packets that are sent through VPN-1 to port 0 of a host. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0804 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the directionality check via fragmented TCP connection requests or reopening closed TCP connection requests, aka "One-way Connection Enforcement Bypass." | |||||
| CVE-2004-0040 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Firewall-1, Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Check Point VPN-1 Server 4.1 through 4.1 SP6 and Check Point SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 through 4.1 build 4200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ISAKMP packet with a large Certificate Request packet. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1176 | 1 Checkpoint | 3 Firewall-1, Provider-1, Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Format string vulnerability in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 allows a remote authenticated firewall administrator to execute arbitrary code via format strings in the control connection. | |||||
| CVE-2006-3885 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Check Point Firewall-1 R55W before HFA03 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an encoded .. (dot dot) in the URL on TCP port 18264. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2679 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 4.1 up to NG AI R55 allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information by sending an Internet Key Exchange (IKE) with a certain Vendor ID payload that causes Firewall-1 to return a response containing version and other information. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1623 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote. | |||||
| CVE-2004-0081 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 66 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 63 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. | |||||
| CVE-2000-1032 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The client authentication interface for Check Point Firewall-1 4.0 and earlier generates different error messages for invalid usernames versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to identify valid usernames on the firewall. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0808 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The seed generation mechanism in the inter-module S/Key authentication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a brute force attack, aka "One-time (s/key) Password Authentication." | |||||
| CVE-2001-1102 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 6.2 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 3.0b through 4.1 for Solaris allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary policy files that end in a .cpp extension, which are set world-writable. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0150 | 2 Checkpoint, Cisco | 2 Firewall-1, Pix Firewall Software | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to bypass port access restrictions on an FTP server by forcing it to send malicious packets that Firewall-1 misinterprets as a valid 227 response to a client's PASV attempt. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1431 | 2 Checkpoint, Nokia | 3 Firewall-1, Vpn-1, Firewall Appliance | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Nokia Firewall Appliances running IPSO 3.3 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 3, IPSO 3.4 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 4, and IPSO 3.4 or IPSO 3.4.1 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 5, when SYN Defender is configured in Active Gateway mode, does not properly rewrite the third packet of a TCP three-way handshake to use the NAT IP address, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information. | |||||