Filtered by vendor Python
Subscribe
Total
224 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-4980 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the repr function in Python 2.3 through 2.6 before 20060822 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted wide character UTF-32/UCS-4 strings to certain scripts. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5983 | 3 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Python | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Python | 2025-04-09 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in the PySys_SetArgv API function in Python 2.6 and earlier, and possibly later versions, prepends an empty string to sys.path when the argv[0] argument does not contain a path separator, which might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse Python file in the current working directory. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2052 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Off-by-one error in the PyLocale_strxfrm function in Modules/_localemodule.c for Python 2.4 and 2.5 causes an incorrect buffer size to be used for the strxfrm function, which allows context-dependent attackers to read portions of memory via unknown manipulations that trigger a buffer over-read due to missing null termination. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5031 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in Python 2.2.3 through 2.5.1, and 2.6, allow context-dependent attackers to have an unknown impact via a large integer value in the tabsize argument to the expandtabs method, as implemented by (1) the string_expandtabs function in Objects/stringobject.c and (2) the unicode_expandtabs function in Objects/unicodeobject.c. NOTE: this vulnerability reportedly exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-2315. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3142 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Python | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Python 2.5.2 and earlier on 32bit platforms allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or have unspecified other impact via a long string that leads to incorrect memory allocation during Unicode string processing, related to the unicode_resize function and the PyMem_RESIZE macro. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1887 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Python | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python | 2025-04-09 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Python 2.5.2 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via multiple vectors that cause a negative size value to be provided to the PyString_FromStringAndSize function, which allocates less memory than expected when assert() is disabled and triggers a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1721 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Python | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer signedness error in the zlib extension module in Python 2.5.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative signed integer, which triggers insufficient memory allocation and a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2316 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c in the hashlib module in Python 2.5.2 and earlier might allow context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic digests, related to "partial hashlib hashing of data exceeding 4GB." | |||||
| CVE-2008-3143 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in Python before 2.5.2 might allow context-dependent attackers to have an unknown impact via vectors related to (1) Include/pymem.h; (2) _csv.c, (3) _struct.c, (4) arraymodule.c, (5) audioop.c, (6) binascii.c, (7) cPickle.c, (8) cStringIO.c, (9) cjkcodecs/multibytecodec.c, (10) datetimemodule.c, (11) md5.c, (12) rgbimgmodule.c, and (13) stropmodule.c in Modules/; (14) bufferobject.c, (15) listobject.c, and (16) obmalloc.c in Objects/; (17) Parser/node.c; and (18) asdl.c, (19) ast.c, (20) bltinmodule.c, and (21) compile.c in Python/, as addressed by "checks for integer overflows, contributed by Google." | |||||
| CVE-2008-4864 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in imageop.c in the imageop module in Python 1.5.2 through 2.5.1 allow context-dependent attackers to break out of the Python VM and execute arbitrary code via large integer values in certain arguments to the crop function, leading to a buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-4965 and CVE-2008-1679. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2940 | 2 Pygresql, Python | 2 Pygresql, Python | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The pygresql module 3.8.1 and 4.0 for Python does not properly support the PQescapeStringConn function, which might allow remote attackers to leverage escaping issues involving multibyte character encodings. | |||||
| CVE-2004-0150 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the getaddrinfo function in Python 2.2 before 2.2.2, when IPv6 support is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an IPv6 address that is obtained using DNS. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1119 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| os._execvpe from os.py in Python 2.2.1 and earlier creates temporary files with predictable names, which could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a symlink attack. | |||||
| CVE-2005-0089 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The SimpleXMLRPCServer library module in Python 2.2, 2.3 before 2.3.5, and 2.4, when used by XML-RPC servers that use the register_instance method to register an object without a _dispatch method, allows remote attackers to read or modify globals of the associated module, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via dotted attributes. | |||||
| CVE-2006-1542 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-03 | 3.7 LOW | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6232 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-03-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. Regular expressions that allowed excessive backtracking during tarfile.TarFile header parsing are vulnerable to ReDoS via specifically-crafted tar archives. | |||||
| CVE-2023-24329 | 3 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Python | 6 Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager, Management Services For Element Software and 3 more | 2025-03-18 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters. | |||||
| CVE-2023-45803 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Urllib3 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren't expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False` and disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32681 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Requests | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Requests is a HTTP library. Since Requests 2.3.0, Requests has been leaking Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers when redirected to an HTTPS endpoint. This is a product of how we use `rebuild_proxies` to reattach the `Proxy-Authorization` header to requests. For HTTP connections sent through the tunnel, the proxy will identify the header in the request itself and remove it prior to forwarding to the destination server. However when sent over HTTPS, the `Proxy-Authorization` header must be sent in the CONNECT request as the proxy has no visibility into the tunneled request. This results in Requests forwarding proxy credentials to the destination server unintentionally, allowing a malicious actor to potentially exfiltrate sensitive information. This issue has been patched in version 2.31.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7592 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-02-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is a LOW severity vulnerability affecting CPython, specifically the 'http.cookies' standard library module. When parsing cookies that contained backslashes for quoted characters in the cookie value, the parser would use an algorithm with quadratic complexity, resulting in excess CPU resources being used while parsing the value. | |||||