Filtered by vendor Google
Subscribe
Total
13169 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-32331 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32332 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32333 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In startSpaActivityForApp of SpaActivity.kt, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32346 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32347 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32349 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32350 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-48524 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-48560 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-48563 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-48581 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates through mainline installations due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2024-40664 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-3067 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
Inappropriate implementation in Custom Tabs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 135.0.7049.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform privilege escalation via a crafted app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
CVE-2025-48526 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
In createMultiProfilePagerAdapter of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way for an app to launch the ChooserActivity in another profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-48523 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-22441 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
In getContextForResourcesEnsuringCorrectCachedApkPaths of RemoteViews.java, there is a possible way to load arbitrary java code in a privileged context due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-0076 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to view icons belonging to another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2024-49714 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In avrc_vendor_msg of avrc_opt.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to paired device escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-32312 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In createIntentsList of PackageParser.java , there is a possible way to bypass lazy bundle hardening, allowing modified data to be passed to the next process due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2025-26463 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In allowPackageAccess of multiple files, resource exhaustion is possible when repeatedly adding allowed packages. This could lead to a local persistent denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |