Total
156 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-30586 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-05-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Node.js 20 that allowed loading arbitrary OpenSSL engines when the experimental permission model is enabled, which can bypass and/or disable the permission model. The attack complexity is high. However, the crypto.setEngine() API can be used to bypass the permission model when called with a compatible OpenSSL engine. The OpenSSL engine can, for example, disable the permission model in the host process by manipulating the process's stack memory to locate the permission model Permission::enabled_ in the host process's heap memory. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23918 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-05-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Node.js <19.6.1, <18.14.1, <16.19.1 and <14.21.3 that made it possible to bypass the experimental Permissions (https://nodejs.org/api/permissions.html) feature in Node.js and access non authorized modules by using process.mainModule.require(). This only affects users who had enabled the experimental permissions option with --experimental-policy. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32006 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-05-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The use of `module.constructor.createRequire()` can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition for a given module. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x, and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32004 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-05-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in Node.js version 20, specifically within the experimental permission model. This flaw relates to improper handling of Buffers in file system APIs causing a traversal path to bypass when verifying file permissions. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3786 | 3 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Openssl | 3 Fedora, Node.js, Openssl | 2025-05-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3602 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap, Node.js and 1 more | 2025-05-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). | |||||
| CVE-2023-32005 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-05-05 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Node.js version 20, affecting users of the experimental permission model when the --allow-fs-read flag is used with a non-* argument. This flaw arises from an inadequate permission model that fails to restrict file stats through the `fs.statfs` API. As a result, malicious actors can retrieve stats from files that they do not have explicit read access to. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43548 | 2 Debian, Nodejs | 2 Debian Linux, Node.js | 2025-04-24 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.21.1, <16.18.1, <18.12.1, <19.0.1 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks.The fix for this issue in https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-32212 was incomplete and this new CVE is to complete the fix. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35256 | 4 Debian, Llhttp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Llhttp, Node.js and 1 more | 2025-04-24 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v18.7.0 does not correctly handle header fields that are not terminated with CLRF. This may result in HTTP Request Smuggling. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35255 | 3 Debian, Nodejs, Siemens | 3 Debian Linux, Node.js, Sinec Ins | 2025-04-24 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A weak randomness in WebCrypto keygen vulnerability exists in Node.js 18 due to a change with EntropySource() in SecretKeyGenTraits::DoKeyGen() in src/crypto/crypto_keygen.cc. There are two problems with this: 1) It does not check the return value, it assumes EntropySource() always succeeds, but it can (and sometimes will) fail. 2) The random data returned byEntropySource() may not be cryptographically strong and therefore not suitable as keying material. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8860 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The tar package before 2.0.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack in an archive. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7384 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js 4.0.0, 4.1.0, and 4.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2013-7452 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via a crafted javascript URI. | |||||
| CVE-2013-7451 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS filter via a nested tag. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15896 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Node.js was affected by OpenSSL vulnerability CVE-2017-3737 in regards to the use of SSL_read() due to TLS handshake failure. The result was that an active network attacker could send application data to Node.js using the TLS or HTTP2 modules in a way that bypassed TLS authentication and encryption. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9843 | 10 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 7 more | 24 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 21 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The crc32_big function in crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving big-endian CRC calculation. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000381 | 3 C-ares, C-ares Project, Nodejs | 3 C-ares, C-ares, Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The c-ares function `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`, which is used for parsing NAPTR responses, could be triggered to read memory outside of the given input buffer if the passed in DNS response packet was crafted in a particular way. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14919 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js before 4.8.5, 6.x before 6.11.5, and 8.x before 8.8.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uncaught exception and crash) by leveraging a change in the zlib module 1.2.9 making 8 an invalid value for the windowBits parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 2 Nodejs, Openssl | 2 Node.js, Openssl | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9842 | 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more | 19 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 16 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The inflateMark function in inflate.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving left shifts of negative integers. | |||||