Total
10571 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-21671 | 1 Qualcomm | 48 Fastconnect 6700, Fastconnect 6700 Firmware, Fastconnect 6900 and 45 more | 2025-08-11 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| Memory Corruption in Core during syscall for Sectools Fuse comparison feature. | |||||
| CVE-2023-33057 | 1 Qualcomm | 202 315 5g Iot Modem, 315 5g Iot Modem Firmware, Ar8035 and 199 more | 2025-08-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Transient DOS in Multi-Mode Call Processor while processing UE policy container. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8582 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-08-11 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Core in Google Chrome prior to 139.0.7258.66 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2025-54368 | 2025-08-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| uv is a Python package and project manager written in Rust. In versions 0.8.5 and earlier, remote ZIP archives were handled in a streamwise fashion, and file entries were not reconciled against the archive's central directory. An attacker could contrive a ZIP archive that would extract with legitimate contents on some package installers, and malicious contents on others due to multiple local file entries. An attacker could also contrive a "stacked" ZIP input with multiple internal ZIPs, which would be handled differently by different package installers. The attacker could choose which installer to target in both scenarios. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.6. To work around this issue, users may choose to set UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1 to revert to the previous behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6444 | 1 Servicestack | 1 Servicestack | 2025-08-08 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| ServiceStack GetErrorResponse Improper Input Validation NTLM Relay Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to relay NTLM credentials on affected installations of ServiceStack. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the GetErrorResponse method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to relay NTLM credentials in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25834. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 12 Apache, Apple, Bentley and 9 more | 167 Log4j, Xcode, Synchro and 164 more | 2025-08-08 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20184 | 1 Cisco | 14 Asyncos, Secure Email Gateway C195, Secure Email Gateway C395 and 11 more | 2025-08-08 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an affected device. The attacker must authenticate with valid administrator credentials. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of XML configuration files by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted XML configuration file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject commands to the underlying operating system with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2023-32170 | 1 Unified-automation | 1 Uagateway | 2025-08-08 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Unified Automation UaGateway OPC UA Server Improper Input Validation Denial-of-Service Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create a denial-of-service condition on affected installations of Unified Automation UaGateway. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must choose to accept a client certificate. The specific flaw exists within the processing of client certificates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of certificate data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to create a denial-of-service condition on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-20494. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3999 | 2 Apple, Vmware | 4 Mac Os X, Esxi, Fusion and 1 more | 2025-08-08 | 2.1 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| VMware ESXi (7.0 prior to ESXi70U1c-17325551), VMware Workstation (16.x prior to 16.0 and 15.x prior to 15.5.7), VMware Fusion (12.x prior to 12.0 and 11.x prior to 11.5.7) and VMware Cloud Foundation contain a denial of service vulnerability due to improper input validation in GuestInfo. A malicious actor with normal user privilege access to a virtual machine can crash the virtual machine's vmx process leading to a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5969 | 1 Coderevolution | 1 Aiomatic | 2025-08-08 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| The AIomatic - Automatic AI Content Writer for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary email sending vulnerability in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to insufficient limitations on the email recipient and the content in the 'aiomatic_send_email' function which are reachable via AJAX. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send emails with any content to any recipient. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34099 | 2025-08-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in VICIdial versions 2.9 RC1 through 2.13 RC1, within the vicidial_sales_viewer.php component when password encryption is enabled (a non-default configuration). The application improperly passes the HTTP Basic Authentication password directly to a call to exec() without adequate sanitation. This allows remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands as the web server user. NOTE: This vulnerability was mitigated in 2017. | |||||
| CVE-2023-45648 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Tomcat, Debian Linux | 2025-08-07 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.Tomcat from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M11, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.13, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.81 and from 8.5.0 through 8.5.93 did not correctly parse HTTP trailer headers. A specially crafted, invalid trailer header could cause Tomcat to treat a single request as multiple requests leading to the possibility of request smuggling when behind a reverse proxy. Older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M12 onwards, 10.1.14 onwards, 9.0.81 onwards or 8.5.94 onwards, which fix the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3777 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Transformers | 2025-08-07 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| Hugging Face Transformers versions up to 4.49.0 are affected by an improper input validation vulnerability in the `image_utils.py` file. The vulnerability arises from insecure URL validation using the `startswith()` method, which can be bypassed through URL username injection. This allows attackers to craft URLs that appear to be from YouTube but resolve to malicious domains, potentially leading to phishing attacks, malware distribution, or data exfiltration. The issue is fixed in version 4.52.1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3538 | 1 Cisco | 1 Data Center Network Manager | 2025-08-06 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in a certain REST API endpoint of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a path traversal attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient path restriction enforcement. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite or list arbitrary files on the affected device.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20271 | 1 Cisco | 14 Business 140ac, Business 140ac Access Point, Business 141acm and 11 more | 2025-08-06 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the IP packet processing of Cisco Access Point (AP) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of certain IPv4 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPv4 packet either to or through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker does not need to be associated with the affected AP. This vulnerability cannot be exploited by sending IPv6 packets. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7674 | 2025-08-05 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Roche Diagnostics navify Monitoring allows an attacker to manipulate input data, which may lead to a denial of service (DoS) due to negatively impacting the server's performance. This vulnerability has no impact on data confidentiality or integrity. This issue affects navify Monitoring before 1.08.00. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20183 | 1 Cisco | 8 Asyncos, Secure Web Appliance S196, Secure Web Appliance S396 and 5 more | 2025-08-05 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in a policy-based Cisco Application Visibility and Control (AVC) implementation of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to evade the antivirus scanner and download a malicious file onto an endpoint. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of a crafted range request header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an HTTP request with a crafted range request header through the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to evade the antivirus scanner and download malware onto the endpoint without detection by Cisco Secure Web Appliance. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52279 | 1 Apache | 1 Zeppelin | 2025-08-05 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Zeppelin. The fix for JDBC URL validation in CVE-2024-31864 did not account for URL encoded input. This issue affects Apache Zeppelin: from 0.11.1 before 0.12.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.12.0, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-47281 | 1 Kyverno | 1 Kyverno | 2025-08-05 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| Kyverno is a policy engine designed for cloud native platform engineering teams. In versions 1.14.1 and below, a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists due to improper handling of JMESPath variable substitutions. Attackers with permissions to create or update Kyverno policies can craft expressions using the {{@}} variable combined with a pipe and an invalid JMESPath function (e.g., {{@ | non_existent_function }}). This leads to a nil value being substituted into the policy structure. Subsequent processing by internal functions, specifically getValueAsStringMap, which expect string values, results in a panic due to a type assertion failure (interface {} is nil, not string). This crashes Kyverno worker threads in the admission controller and causes continuous crashes of the reports controller pod. This is fixed in version 1.14.2. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20274 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Management Center | 2025-08-05 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML content into a device-generated document. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting malicious content to an affected device and using the device to generate a document that contains sensitive information. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the standard layout of the device-generated documents, access arbitrary files from the underlying operating system, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid credentials for a user account with policy-editing permissions, such as Network Admin, Intrusion Admin, or any custom user role with the same capabilities. | |||||