Filtered by vendor Symantec
Subscribe
Total
571 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-37015 | 1 Symantec | 1 Endpoint Detection And Response | 2025-05-01 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (SEDR) Appliance, prior to 4.7.0, may be susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability, which is a type of issue whereby an attacker may attempt to compromise the software application to gain elevated access to resources that are normally protected from an application or user. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25630 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-23 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An authenticated user can embed malicious content with XSS into the admin group policy page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25629 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-23 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An authenticated user who has the privilege to add/edit annotations on the Content tab, can craft a malicious annotation that can be executed on the annotations page (Annotation Text Column). | |||||
| CVE-2017-6326 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a situation whereby an individual may obtain the ability to execute commands remotely on a target machine or in a target process. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9092 | 1 Symantec | 2 Content Analysis, Mail Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6327 | 1 Symantec | 1 Message Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.6.3-267 can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a situation whereby an individual may obtain the ability to execute commands remotely on a target machine or in a target process. In this type of occurrence, after gaining access to the system, the attacker may attempt to elevate their privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15527 | 1 Symantec | 1 Management Console | 2025-04-20 | 5.2 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Prior to ITMS 8.1 RU4, the Symantec Management Console can be susceptible to a directory traversal exploit, which is a type of attack that can occur when there is insufficient security validation / sanitization of user-supplied input file names, such that characters representing "traverse to parent directory" are passed through to the file APIs. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15525 | 1 Symantec | 1 Endpoint Encryption | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| Prior to SEE v11.1.3MP1, Symantec Endpoint Encryption can be susceptible to a denial of service (DoS) attack, which is a type of attack whereby the perpetrator attempts to make a particular machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a specific host within a network. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13674 | 1 Symantec | 1 Proxyclient | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Symantec ProxyClient 3.4 for Windows is susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious local Windows user can, under certain circumstances, exploit this vulnerability to escalate their privileges on the system and execute arbitrary code with LocalSystem privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6324 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway, when processing a specific email attachment, can allow a malformed or corrupted Word file with a potentially malicious macro through despite the administrator having the 'disarm' functionality enabled. This constitutes a 'bypass' of the disarm functionality resident to the application. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5312 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the charting component in Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.6.2 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the sn parameter to brightmail/servlet/com.ve.kavachart.servlet.ChartStream. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13679 | 1 Symantec | 1 Encryption Desktop | 2025-04-20 | 1.4 LOW | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service (DoS) attack in Symantec Encryption Desktop before SED 10.4.1 MP2HF1 allows remote attackers to make a particular machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a specific host within a network. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4523 | 1 Symantec | 2 Malware Analysis Appliance, Malware Analyzer G2 | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| Blue Coat Malware Analysis Appliance (MAA) before 4.2.5 and Malware Analyzer G2 allow remote attackers to bypass a virtual machine protection mechanism and consequently write to arbitrary files, cause a denial of service (host reboot or reset to factory defaults), or execute arbitrary code via vectors related to saving files during analysis. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6325 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter a file inclusion vulnerability, which is a type of vulnerability that is most commonly found to affect web applications that rely on a scripting run time. This issue is caused when an application builds a path to executable code using an attacker-controlled variable in a way that allows the attacker to control which file is executed at run time. This file inclusion vulnerability subverts how an application loads code for execution. Successful exploitation of a file inclusion vulnerability will result in remote code execution on the web server that runs the affected web application. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13680 | 2 Microsoft, Symantec | 2 Windows, Endpoint Protection | 2025-04-20 | 3.6 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Prior to SEP 12.1 RU6 MP9 & SEP 14 RU1 Symantec Endpoint Protection Windows endpoint can encounter a situation whereby an attacker could use the product's UI to perform unauthorized file deletes on the resident file system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13682 | 1 Symantec | 1 Encryption Desktop | 2025-04-20 | 2.3 LOW | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In Symantec Encryption Desktop before SED 10.4.1 MP2HF1, a kernel memory leak is a type of resource leak that can occur when a computer program incorrectly manages memory allocations in such a way that memory which is no longer needed is not released. In object-oriented programming, a memory leak may happen when an object is stored in memory but cannot be accessed by the running code. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5313 | 1 Symantec | 1 Web Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Symantec Web Gateway (SWG) before 5.2.5 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15532 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| Prior to 10.6.4, Symantec Messaging Gateway may be susceptible to a path traversal attack (also known as directory traversal). These types of attacks aim to access files and directories that are stored outside the web root folder. By manipulating variables, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on the file system including application source code or configuration and critical system files. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15529 | 1 Symantec | 1 Norton Family | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Prior to 4.4.1.10, the Norton Family Android App can be susceptible to a Denial of Service (DoS) exploit. A DoS attack is a type of attack whereby the perpetrator attempts to make a particular device unavailable to its intended user by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a specific host within a network. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15530 | 1 Symantec | 1 Norton Family | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Prior to 4.4.1.10, the Norton Family Android App can be susceptible to an Information Disclosure issue. Information disclosure is a very common issue that attackers will attempt to exploit as a first pass across the application. As they probe the application they will take note of anything that may seem out of place or any bit of information they can use to their advantage such as error messages, system information, user data, version numbers, component names, URL paths, or even simple typos and misspellings. | |||||